Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks sign Erik Gudbranson to 3-year extension, face Avalanche Ahead of their Tuesday-night game against the Colorado Avalanche, the Vancouver Canucks signed defenseman Erik Gudbranson to a three-year contract extension and recalled goaltender Richard Bachman to back up in place of injured Jacob Markstrom.

Not the worst.

Thanks Carol

Thanks Carol!

Not the worst.
- RonPielep

good signing, or not the worst?

PS - stop editing lol

it's pretty good, Carol

Not the worst.
- RonPielep

Also my reaction

& I really dont like Gudbranson

But guys Like Kulikov and Russell got more, and they both suck.
& not having a NTC is big.

This team wont be in the playoffs in the next 2 years anyways.

@Codes

Not the worst. I was going to be a little snarky at first but then I member'd the new sensitivity policy over here so I kept my response pretty humorless and straight edge.

@classic

+1

@Codes

Not the worst. I was going to be a little snarky at first but then I member'd the new sensitivity policy over here so I kept my response pretty humorless and straight edge.
- RonPielep

well it is 2018 after all

#Sensitivitypolicy
Hand holding workshop, 6pm Pacific Time.

Haven't been around in a bit but I'm interested in knowing what y'all thought the return (in terms of picks) would have been if Gud was traded at the deadline?

Also interested in what you guys think Vanek could return and/or MDZ.

Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks sign Erik Gudbranson to 3-year extension, face Avalanche
Ahead of their Tuesday-night game against the Colorado Avalanche, the Vancouver Canucks signed defenseman Erik Gudbranson to a three-year contract extension and recalled goaltender Richard Bachman to back up in place of injured Jacob Markstrom.
- Carol Schram

Thanks Carol !!!!!!!!

Thanks Carol !!!!!!!!
- Matthews_Auston

Thanks Buston!!!!

Awesome news. Gudbranson is going to just get better.

It's fun watching the HFBoards implode.

Thanks Carol !!!!!!!!
- Matthews_Auston

Thanks Buston

I’m offended Carol has labeled me “a hater” 🤪

Haven't been around in a bit but I'm interested in knowing what y'all thought the return (in terms of picks) would have been if Gud was traded at the deadline?

Also interested in what you guys think Vanek could return and/or MDZ.
- RonPielep

I think the first question would best be answered after the TDL. We will have a good indication of what we believe he would have gone for, after we see the rests of the defensemen traded.

Vanek is probably worth a 3rd IMO. MDZ, I would imagine not very high. 4th maybe?

Awesome news. Gudbranson is going to just get better.

It's fun watching the HFBoards implode.
- Slip and slap

LOL !!!

I’m offended Carol has labeled me “a hater” 🤪
- LeftCoaster

she's definitely on team pom pom

Why couldn't you trade Gudbranson for a 1st, tell him he has a shot for the cup elsewhere this season, but then promise him you'd sign him back, even do a Gentleman's (Gentleperson's) agreement?

No NTC, could still get traded

No NTC, could still get traded
- pker2theend

lol

@Codes

Not the worst. I was going to be a little snarky at first but then I member'd the new sensitivity policy over here so I kept my response pretty humorless and straight edge.
- RonPielep

Being humorless is now considered offensive to most now. In other news opinions are now called Mean Words.

Thanks Carol,

What do you get for Hutton? He's a bench warmer.

Vanek a 3rd or 4th.

I don't see JB making any "hockey trades" before the TDL.

We won't be making any big splash.